Our authors

Our Books
More than 865 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Concise policy briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online symposium

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Symposium on integrity
in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

6.a. [Mental element for element 5] [Conduct of killing]: The perpetrator meant to engage in killing one or more persons

The Akayesu Trial Chamber noted that:

"[With regard to Article 2(2) (a) of the Statute, like in the Genocide Convention, the Chamber notes that the said paragraph states "meurtre" in the French version while the English version states "killing". The Trial Chamber is of the opinion that the term "killing" used in the English version is too general, since it could very well include both intentional and unintentional homicides, whereas the term "meurtre", used in the French version, is more precise. It is accepted that there is murder when death has been caused with the intention to do so, as provided for, incidentally, in the Penal Code of Rwanda which stipulates in its Article 311 that "Homicide committed with intent to cause death shall be treated as murder"."[1]

"Given the presumption of innocence of the accused, and pursuant to the general principles of criminal law, the Chamber holds that the version more favourable to the accused should be upheld and finds that Article 2(2) (a) of the Statute must be interpreted in accordance with the definition of murder given in the Penal Code of Rwanda, according to which "meurtre" (killing) is homicide committed with the intent to cause death. The Chamber notes in this regard that the travaux preparatoires of the Genocide Convention, show that the proposal by certain delegations that premeditation be made a necessary condition for there to be genocide, was rejected, because some delegates deemed it unnecessary for premeditation to be made a requirement; in their opinion, by its constitutive physical elements, the very crime of genocide, necessarily entails premeditation."[2]

The Kayishema and Ruzindana Trial Chamber stated:

"The Chamber observes that the Akayesu Judgement does not fully define the term ?killing.' It is the opinion of the Trial Chamber that there is virtually no difference between the term "killing" in the English version and"meurtre' in the French version of Article 2 (2)(a) of the Statute within the context of genocidal intent. Hence 'killing' or 'meurtre' should be considered along with the specific intent of genocide, that is, the intention to destroy in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such."[3]

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online symposium

Power in international justice
Symposium on power
in international justice

Interviewing
A virtual symposium