Our authors

Our Books
More than 865 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Concise policy briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online symposium

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Symposium on integrity
in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

M.6. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances enabling him to exercise joint control over the crime.

In Lubanga, the Pre-Trial Chamber argued that:

"The Chamber considers that the third and last subjective element of co-perpetration based on joint control of the crime is the awareness by the suspect of the factual circumstances enabling him or her to jointly control the crime. […] [T]his requires the suspect to be aware (i) that his or her role is essential to the implementation of the common plan, and hence in the commission of the crime, and (ii) that he or she can – by reason of the essential nature of his or her task – frustrate the implementation of the common plan, and hence the commission of the crime, by refusing to perform the task assigned to him or her."[1]

In Bemba Gombo, the Pre-Trial Chamber held that:

"The final subjective element that must be met under the theory of coperpetration based on control over the crime is the suspect’s awareness of the factual circumstances enabling him or her to control the crime with the other co-perpetrator. This criterion requires be aware of his essential role in the implementation of the crime; and (2) due to such essential role, to be capable of frustrating its implementation and accordingly the commission of the crime."[2]

The Pre-Trial Chamber in Abakaer Nourain and Jerbo Jamus reasoned that:

"Finally, the Chamber considers that the concept of co-perpetration based on joint control of the crimes requires the awareness by the suspects of the factual circumstances enabling them to jointly control the crime. In particular, it is required that each of the suspects be aware that: (a) his or her role is essential to the implementation of the common plan; and (b) he or she can -by reason of the essential nature of his or her task(s)- frustrate the implementation of the common plan in the way the crime is committed, by refusing to perform the task(s) assigned to him or her."[3]

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online symposium

Power in international justice
Symposium on power
in international justice

Interviewing
A virtual symposium