Our authors

Our Books
More than 865 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Concise policy briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online symposium

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Symposium on integrity
in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Table of contents:

5. [Particular mental element for Element 4]The perpetrator intended such personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles so involved to be the object of the attack.

5.1. The personnel, installations, material units or vehicle involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission were intended to be the object of the attack; AND

P.22. Evidence of a targeted armed attack.

P.22.1. Evidence of organising a targeted armed attack.

P.23. Evidence of beating and killing.

P.24. Evidence of placing a bomb.

P.25. Evidence of destroying property.

P.26. Evidence of placing mines with the purpose of endangering a person.

P.27. Evidence of firing a missile targeting peacekeepers.

P.28. Evidence of a sniper shooting.

P.29. Evidence of firing repeatedly at one or more persons.

P.30. Evidence of abducting.

P.30.1. Evidence of abducting peacekeepers.

P.30.2. Evidence of abducting humanitarian assistance workers.

P.31. Evidence of detaining.

P.31.1. Evidence of detaining peacekeepers.

P.31.2. Evidence of detaining humanitarian assistance workers.

5.2. The perpetrator knew that the object of the attack was personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission.

P.32. Evidence that the object of the attack had a distinctive marking.

P.33. Evidence that the object of the attack was targeted because it was involved in an humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission

P.33.1. Evidence of abducting and detaining UN peacekeepers to use as human shields.

P.33.2. Evidence of killing peacekeepers as part of a widespread and systematic attack against a civilian population on political and national grounds.

P.34. Evidence inferred from a circumstance.

Element:

5. [Particular mental element for Element 4]The perpetrator intended such personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles so involved to be the object of the attack.

Proving that the perpetrator intended to attack the personnel or object because of their involvement with a humanitarian or peacekeeping mission may be a difficult task for the judges of the Court. Indeed, as M.-Christiane Bourloyannis-Vrailas points out, "if such person was wearing a distinctive marking, knowledge [is] obvious. But… the wearing of markings is not an obligation incumbent on civilian personnel and cannot therefore be a prerequisite for proving intent… The determination of intent in each particular case is a matter left to the competent tribunal" (M.-Christiane Bourloyannis-Vrailas, "The Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel", 44 INT’L and COMP. L.Q. 560 (1995), p. 578).

5.1. The personnel, installations, material units or vehicle involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission were intended to be the object of the attack; AND

P.22. Evidence of a targeted armed attack.

P.22.1. Evidence of organising a targeted armed attack.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 649:

"55.In a resolution on Somalia adopted in 1994, the UN Security Council condemned "violence and armed attacks against persons engaged in … peace-keeping efforts" and re-emphasised the importance it attached to "the safety and security of United Nations and other personnel engaged in … peacekeeping throughout Somalia48".

"48UN Security Council, Res. 897, 4 February 1994, Preamble."

P.23. Evidence of beating and killing.

P.24. Evidence of placing a bomb.

P.25. Evidence of destroying property.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 635:

"343. In a resolution adopted in 1999 on the safety and security of humanitarian personnel and protection of UN personnel, the UN General Assembly strongly condemned "acts of destruction and looting" of the property of those participating in humanitarian operations.347 The General Assembly urged all states "to take the necessary measures … to respect and ensure respect for the inviolability of United Nations premises".348"

"347 UN General Assembly, Res. 54/192, 17 December 1999, preamble.

348 UN General Assembly, Res. 55/92, 17 December 1999, §2."

P.26. Evidence of placing mines with the purpose of endangering a person.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Commentary on the Additionnal Protocols of 8 June 1997 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, para.1081:

"During the above-mentionned enquiry the question arose whether the placing of mines constituted an attack. The general feeling was that there is an attack whenever a person is directly endangered by a mine laid".

P.27. Evidence of firing a missile targeting peacekeepers.

P.28. Evidence of a sniper shooting.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 654:

"89. In 1995, in a statement by its President following the fatal shooting of a French peacekeeper by a sniper in Sarajevo, the UN Security Council condemned "in the strongest terms such acts direct at peace-keepers who are serving the cause of peace in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina" and reiterated that such attacks "should not remain unpunished".87"

"87UN Security Council, Statement by the President, UN Doc. S/PRST/1995/, 14 April 1995."

P.29. Evidence of firing repeatedly at one or more persons.

P.30. Evidence of abducting.

P.30.1. Evidence of abducting peacekeepers.

P.30.2. Evidence of abducting humanitarian assistance workers.

P.31. Evidence of detaining.

P.31.1. Evidence of detaining peacekeepers.

P.31.2. Evidence of detaining humanitarian assistance workers.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 649:

"In a resolution adopted in 1994 in the context of the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the UN Security Council condemned "the harassment and the detention of UNPROFOR personnel by the Bosnian Serb forces and all obstacles to UNPROFOR’s freedom of movement".52"

"52 UN Security Council, Res. 913, 22 April 1994, Preamble."

5.2. The perpetrator knew that the object of the attack was personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission.

P.32. Evidence that the object of the attack had a distinctive marking.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

M.-Christiane Bourloyannis-Vrailas, "The Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel", 44 INT’L and COMP. L.Q. 560 (1995), p. 578:

"if such person was wearing a distinctive marking, knowledge [is] obvious. But… the wearing of markings is not an obligation incumbent on civilian personnel and cannot therefore be a prerequisite for proving intent… The determination of intent in each particular case is a matter left to the competent tribunal".

P.33. Evidence that the object of the attack was targeted because it was involved in an humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission

P.33.1. Evidence of abducting and detaining UN peacekeepers to use as human shields.

P.33.2. Evidence of killing peacekeepers as part of a widespread and systematic attack against a civilian population on political and national grounds.

P.34. Evidence inferred from a circumstance.

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online symposium

Power in international justice
Symposium on power
in international justice

Interviewing
A virtual symposium