Our authors

Our Books
More than 865 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Concise policy briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online symposium

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Symposium on integrity
in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

5. The perpetrator killed one or more persons.

According to the Akayesu Trial Chamber Judgment:

"In concrete terms, for any of the acts charged under Article 2 (2) of the Statute to be a constitutive element of genocide, the act must have been committed against one or several individuals, because such individual or individuals were members of a specific group, and specifically because they belonged to this group. Thus, the victim is chosen not because of his individual identity, but rather on account of his membership of a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. The victim of the act is therefore a member of a group, chosen as such, which, hence, means that the victim of the crime of genocide is the group itself and not only the individual."[1]

Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-T, Public Redacted Version of Judgement Issued on 24 March 2016 – Volume I of IV (TC), 24 March 2016, para. 542:

 

"542. The requirements for “killing” referred to under Article 4(2)(a) are equivalent to those for murder under Article 5. Murder as an act of genocide requires proof of a result. The elements of murder have already been detailed in the sections on murder as a crime against humanity and as a violation of the laws or customs of war. A numeric assessment of the number of people killed is not required for the actus reus of genocide to be established."

5.1.1. Killing by directs methods.

P.1. Evidence of killing by particular methods.

P.1.1. Evidence of shooting to death.

P.1.2. Evidence of killing with machetes.

P.1.3. Evidence of killing by grenade.

P.1.4. Evidence of shelling causing death.

P.1.5. Evidence of arson causing death.

P.1.6. Evidence of beatings causing death.

P.2. Evidence of attacks.

P.3. Evidence indicating that killing was occurring.

P.3.1. Evidence of people looting.

P.3.2. Evidence of people fleeing.

5.1.2. Killing by indirect methods.

P.4. Evidence of death caused by conditions of life in detention centres.

P.5. Evidence of death caused by conditions of life in ghettos.

P.6. Evidence of death caused by deportations.

P.7. Evidence of death caused by deprivation of medical services.

P.8. Evidence of death caused by destruction of villages and crops.

5.1.3. Evidence that killings or attacks occurred

P.9. Evidence of attacks

P.10. Evidence of dead bodies

P.10.1. Evidence of dead bodies seen soon after killings by eyewitnesses

P.10.2. Evidence of exhumed bodies identified by eyewitnesses

P.10.3. Evidence of exhumed bodies examined by forensic experts.

P.11. Evidence of specific people whom were never seen again.

Footnotes:

[1] ICTR, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, "Judgement", ICTR-96-4-T, 2 September 1998, para. 521. See also ICTR, Prosecutor v. Gatete,"Judgement", ICTR-2000-61-T, 31 March 2011, para. 584.

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online symposium

Power in international justice
Symposium on power
in international justice

Interviewing
A virtual symposium