Our authors

Our Books
More than 865 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Concise policy briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online symposium

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Symposium on integrity
in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

6.b.i. [Mental element for Element 5] [Consequence of killing]: The perpetrator meant to cause death; OR

In the Dorđević Appeals Judgement, the Appeals Chamber held that:

"While the Appeals Chamber has not expressly considered the terms "meurtre" and "assassinat ", the case law of the ICTY has been consistent in not requiring premeditation as one of the elements of the crime of murder either as a violation of the laws or customs of war or as a crime against humanity. The elements of the crime of murder as a war crime pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute have been established by the ICTY Appeals Chamber as follows: (i) the death of a victim taking no active part in hostilities; (ii) the death was the result of an act or omission of the perpetrator(s) or of one or more persons for whom the accused is criminally responsible; and (iii) the perpetrator intended to kill the victim or wilfully harm or inflict serious injury with reasonable knowledge that the attack was likely to result in death. These elements have been established to be identical to those required for murder as a crime against humanity under Article 5 of the Statute, with the exception that the general chapeau requirements for each be met."[1]

The Blaskić Trial Chamber said:

"The Defence claimed that it is not sufficient to prove that an offence was the result of reckless acts. However, according to the Trial Chamber, the mens rea constituting all the violations of Article 2 of the Statute includes both guilty intent and recklessness which may be likened to serious criminal negligence. [...] ."[2]

According to the Delalić (Čelebići) Trial Judgement:

"[...] the necessary intent, meaning mens rea, required to establish the crimes of wilful killing and murder, as recognised in the Geneva Conventions, is present where there is demonstrated an intention on the part of the accused to kill, or inflict serious injury in reckless disregard of human life."[3]

Footnotes:

[3] ICTY, Prosecutor v. Delalić et al., "Judgement", IT-96-21-T, 16 November 1998, para. 439. See also ICTY, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Cerkez, "Judgement", IT-95-14/2-T, 26 February 2001, para. 236; ICTY, Prosecutor v. Krnojelac, "Judgement", IT-97-25-T, 15 March 2002, para. 324.

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online symposium

Power in international justice
Symposium on power
in international justice

Interviewing
A virtual symposium