Table of contents:
Element:
Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, Judgement (TC), 29 May 2013, paras. 126-127:
"126. To violate the prohibition set out in Article 2(d) of the Statute, the destruction of property must be extensive in scope. The Chamber considers, however, that the criterion that the destruction be extensive in scope must be evaluated in light of the facts of the case, and that a single incident, such as the destruction of a hospital, may suffice to constitute an offence under this count."
"127. The deliberate nature of the offence of the destruction of property is established when the perpetrator acts knowingly with the intent to destroy the property in question or when the property has been destroyed “in reckless disregard of the likelihood of its destruction”."
7.1. The destruction or appropriation was extensive; AND
"[...] The notion of "extensive" is evaluated according to the facts of the case - a single act, such as the destruction of a hospital, may suffice to characterise an offence under this count."[1]
7.1.1. Evidence that the destruction was extensive.
7.1.2. Evidence that the appropriation was extensive;
7.2. The destruction or appropriation was carried out wantonly.
Footnotes:
[1] ICTY, Blaškić Trial Judgment 3 March 2000, para. 157.
