Our authors

Our Books
More than 865 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Concise policy briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online symposium

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Symposium on integrity
in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

3. The perpetrator subjected one or more persons to a medical or scientific experiment.

In the Hoess Trial, the Tribunal found that:

"[...] castration, sterilization, experimentation causing premature termination of pregnancy, experiments on artificial semination, experiments aimed at cancer research (excision of parts of the uterine body, even on healthy young girls with no sign of cancer), and other experiments (deprival of virginity of young girls and injecting women with hormones)"."[1]

In the Milch case, the Tribunal found that:

"The so-called medical experiments consisted of placing the subject in an airtight chamber in which the air pressure is mechanically reduced so that it is comparable with the pressure to which an aviator is subjected at high altitudes, and in experimenting upon the effect of extreme dry and wet cold upon the human body."[2]

In the Nuremberg Tribunal's case of the Trial of Brandt and others, known as the Medical Case, the Trial Chamber found that:

"[...] the defendants 'were principals in, accessories to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting part in, and were connected with plans and enterprises involving medical experiments without the subjects' consent * * * in the course of which experiments the defendants committed murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, atrocities, and other inhuman acts.' It is averred that 'such experiments included, but were not limited to' the following: '(A) High-Altitude Experiments[, ...] (B) Freezing Experiments[, ...] (C) Malaria Experiments[, ...] (D) Lost (Mustard) Gas Experiments[, ...] (E) Sulfanilamide Experiments[, ...] (F) Bone, Muscle, and Nerve Regeneration and Bone Transplanation Experiments[, ...] (G) Sea-Water Experiments[, ...] (H) Epidemic Jaundice Experiments[, ...] (I) Sterilization Experiments[, ...] (J) Spotted Fever (Fleckfieber) Experiments[, ...] (K) Experiments with Poison[, ...] (L) Incendiary Bomb Experiments [...]"[3]

Footnotes:

[1] Trial of Obersturmbannfィケhrer Rudolf Franz Ferdinand Hoess, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, UNWCC, Vol. VII, p. 14-16.

[2] Trial of Eberhard Milch, United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 20 December 1946-17 April 1947, p. 772.

[3] Trial of K. Brandt and Others ('The Medical Case'), Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council No. 10, October 1946- April 1949, Vol. II, pp. 180-183.

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online symposium

Power in international justice
Symposium on power
in international justice

Interviewing
A virtual symposium