Our authors

Our Books
More than 865 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Concise policy briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online symposium

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Symposium on integrity
in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Table of contents:

6.c. [Mental element for Element 3] [Circumstance of force, threat of force or coercion]: The perpetrator was aware that he or she would commit an act of a sexual nature or would cause a person or persons to engage in an act of a sexual nature by force, or by threat of force or coercion, or by taking advantage of a coercive environment or such person's or persons' incapacity to give genuine consent.

P.38. Evidence inferred from a utterance, a document or a deed.

P.38.1. Evidence of using physical force on a person or persons.

P.38.2. Evidence of threatening one or more persons using a weapon.

P.38.3. Evidence of pointing a gun or rifle.

P.38.4. Evidence of threatening to cut off private parts using a knife.

P.38.5. Evidence of threatening verbally to kill one or more persons.

P.38.6. Evidence of threatening to use force against a third person.

P.38.7. Evidence of "bribing" one or more persons to "agree" to sexual intercourse.

P.38.8. Evidence of promising to spare family members.

P.38.9. Evidence of providing food and water.

P.38.10. Evidence of changing detention conditions.

P.39. Evidence inferred from a circumstance.

P.39.1. Evidence of regular violence against detainees.

P.39.2. Evidence of detention in privately owned apartments.

P.39.3. Evidence of psychological oppression amounting to de facto detention.

P.39.4. Evidence of constant fear.

P.39.5. Evidence of constant threat of being subject to sexual violence.

P.39.6. Evidence of victims being subjected to the authority of the perpetrator.

P.39.7. Evidence of the involvement of local authorities.

P.39.8. Evidence of an armed conflict.

P.39.9. Evidence of a military presence.

P.39.10. Evidence of a military presence in a refugee camp.

P.39.11. Evidence of physical incapacity.

P.39.12. Evidence of mental incapacity.

P.39.13. Evidence of induced incapacity.

P.39.14. Evidence of an element of surprise inducing incapacity.

P.39.15. Evidence of an element of misrepresentation inducing incapacity.

P.39.16. Evidence of incapacity caused by intoxication.

P.39.17. Evidence of age-related incapacity to consent.

Element:

6.c. [Mental element for Element 3] [Circumstance of force, threat of force or coercion]: The perpetrator was aware that he or she would commit an act of a sexual nature or would cause a person or persons to engage in an act of a sexual nature by force, or by threat of force or coercion, or by taking advantage of a coercive environment or such person's or persons' incapacity to give genuine consent.

P.38. Evidence inferred from a utterance, a document or a deed.

P.38.1. Evidence of using physical force on a person or persons.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 210:

 

"621T 2018."

Prosecutor v. Alfred Musema, Case No. ICTR-96-13-T, Judgement (TC), 27 January 2000, para. 833:

Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, Judgement (TC), 2 September 1998, paras. 424, 437:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.2. Evidence of threatening one or more persons using a weapon.

P.38.3. Evidence of pointing a gun or rifle.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalić et al., Case No. IT-96-21-T, Judgement (TC), 16 November 1998, para. 958:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.4. Evidence of threatening to cut off private parts using a knife.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvočka et al., Case No. IT-98-30/1-T, Judgement (TC), 2 November 2001, para. 98:

"237 Sifeta Susic, T. 3020-3021.

238 Witness J, T. 4769; Zlata Cikota, T. 3337-3338.

239 Witness J, T. 4774-4775; Witness AT, T. 6083; Witness K, T. 4983; Witness A, T. 5486; Witness F, T. 5382; Sifeta Susic, T. 3018"

Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalić et al., Case No. IT-96-21-T, Judgement (TC), 16 November 1998, para. 960:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.5. Evidence of threatening verbally to kill one or more persons.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, paras. 68, 645, 761:

"205. T 1720 and T 1814-1815."

Prosecutor v. Alfred Musema, Case No. ICTR-96-13-T, Judgement (TC), 27 January 2000, para. 833:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.6. Evidence of threatening to use force against a third person.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Anto Furundžija, Case No. IT-95-17/1-T, Judgement (TC), 10 December 1998, paras. 82, 174:

"96 T. 406; Defence Exhibit D13, p. 6.
97T. 406-407; Prosecution Exhibit P3, p. 25; Defence Exhibit D13, p. 6.
98T. 408-409.
99 T. 416.
100 T. 455."

"174. The Trial Chamber notes the unchallenged submission of the Prosecution in its Pre-trial Brief that rape is a forcible act: this means that the act is "accomplished by force or threats of force against the victim or a third person, such threats being express or implied and must place the victim in reasonable fear that he, she or a third person will be subjected to violence, detention, duress or psychological oppression" ".199

"199Prosecution's Pre-trial Brief, p. 15."

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.7. Evidence of "bribing" one or more persons to "agree" to sexual intercourse.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 542:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.8. Evidence of promising to spare family members.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvočka et al., Case No. IT-98-30/1-T, Judgement (TC), 2 November 2001, para. 551:

"896 Witness K, T. 4983-4984, 5056.
897 Witness K, T. 4983-4984.
898 Witness K, T. 4984-4985, 4987-4988.
899 Witness K, T. 5058."

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.9. Evidence of providing food and water.

P.38.10. Evidence of changing detention conditions.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvočka et al., Case No. IT-98-30/1-T, Judgement (TC), 2 November 2001, para. 555:

"906Witness AT, T. 6152-6155."

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39. Evidence inferred from a circumstance.

P.39.1. Evidence of regular violence against detainees.

"236 Witness J, T. 4774-4775; Witness F, T. 5382-5383; Witness B, T. 2338, 2430; Nedzija Fazlic, T. 5102; Sifeta Susic, T. 3018-3019."

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 574:

Prosecutor v. Anto Furundžija, Case No. IT-95-17/1-T, Judgement (TC), 10 December 1998, paras. 89, 271:

Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, Judgement (TC), 7 May 1997 paras. 165, 175:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.2. Evidence of detention in privately owned apartments.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-A and IT-96-23/1-A, Judgement (AC), 12 June 2002, para. 132:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, paras. 68, 210, 750, 780:

"205 T 1720 and T 1814-1815."

"621T 2018."

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.3. Evidence of psychological oppression amounting to de facto detention.

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, paras. 747, 750, 780:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.4. Evidence of constant fear.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 747:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.5. Evidence of constant threat of being subject to sexual violence.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.6. Evidence of victims being subjected to the authority of the perpetrator.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 780:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.7. Evidence of the involvement of local authorities.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 576:

Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalić et al., Case No. IT-96-21-T, Judgement (TC), 16 November 1998, para. 495:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.8. Evidence of an armed conflict.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-A and IT-96-23/1-A, Judgement (AC), 12 June 2002, para. 130:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 646:

Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalić et al., Case No. IT-96-21-T, Judgement (TC), 16 November 1998, para. 495:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.9. Evidence of a military presence.

P.39.10. Evidence of a military presence in a refugee camp.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.11. Evidence of physical incapacity.

P.39.12. Evidence of mental incapacity.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 387:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.13. Evidence of induced incapacity.

P.39.14. Evidence of an element of surprise inducing incapacity.

P.39.15. Evidence of an element of misrepresentation inducing incapacity.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 387:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39.16. Evidence of incapacity caused by intoxication.

P.39.17. Evidence of age-related incapacity to consent.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, para. 591:

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online symposium

Power in international justice
Symposium on power
in international justice

Interviewing
A virtual symposium